NANO3
04-30 04:26 PM
thanks C:-)
wallpaper Lauren Conrad, 2008 Emmy
sundarpn
04-07 10:45 PM
I am a resident working on H1b. Got married and wife joined me in July 2010.
1. First question in the ITIN form w-7 is: Reason you are submitting Form W-7. (there are couple of options)
Is the option in my case: "Spouse of U.S. citizen/resident alien"? (and it asks for the resident's i.e. my name and SSN.)
2. Item 6d. "Identification documents submitted" ?
Options are for passport, Divers License, USCIS documentation.
My wife has all the three. Her H4 visa is stamped and valid. What all should I submit?
Thx
1. First question in the ITIN form w-7 is: Reason you are submitting Form W-7. (there are couple of options)
Is the option in my case: "Spouse of U.S. citizen/resident alien"? (and it asks for the resident's i.e. my name and SSN.)
2. Item 6d. "Identification documents submitted" ?
Options are for passport, Divers License, USCIS documentation.
My wife has all the three. Her H4 visa is stamped and valid. What all should I submit?
Thx
sankap
07-25 03:34 PM
She definitely would have issues if plan to travel in TN visa. TN visa is not supposed to have any immigration intent.
The best thing to do is change her status to parolee and start working using EAD. There is no reason for her to continue in TN status, after filing 485.
-Morchu
I agree w/ Morch: TN, unlike H1B, is not a dual-intent visa. Change to EAD/AP.
The best thing to do is change her status to parolee and start working using EAD. There is no reason for her to continue in TN status, after filing 485.
-Morchu
I agree w/ Morch: TN, unlike H1B, is not a dual-intent visa. Change to EAD/AP.
2011 Labels: Lauren Conrad
BMS1
11-02 05:47 PM
1. You can work with EAD for whomever you want.
2. Technically someone may be able to establish that this is legal. But you may have to be very careful and may end up having to prove that both you and the original sponsor had real intent to have the employment relationship and may have to explain why that intent could not be translated to reality. If your explanation is not satisfactory to the adjudication officer (this ia a subjective matter), he can treat the whole affair as fraud and you will have your hands full for a long time.
This is my opinion.
2. Technically someone may be able to establish that this is legal. But you may have to be very careful and may end up having to prove that both you and the original sponsor had real intent to have the employment relationship and may have to explain why that intent could not be translated to reality. If your explanation is not satisfactory to the adjudication officer (this ia a subjective matter), he can treat the whole affair as fraud and you will have your hands full for a long time.
This is my opinion.
more...
gconmymind
09-19 12:25 PM
Anytime your place of work changes on H1, your company should file an amendment to the H1B labor certification stating your new place of work.
Hopefully, the officer at the consulate wont ask and you wont have a problem.
Personally, I have my client's location as well as my company's location on my H1 LCA.
Hopefully, the officer at the consulate wont ask and you wont have a problem.
Personally, I have my client's location as well as my company's location on my H1 LCA.
afp
02-25 01:50 PM
Hi,
I was on regular H1B for three years until mid 2008 when I changed to H4 status. Now, if I want to work for a non-profit organization, does the org have to just transfer the original H1B or file a new non-profit petition. If it is the latter (new petition) what happens to my original H1 approval? If I want to go back to the for-profit world do I need to apply for a new H1 or will my original H1 validity continue??
Thanks
AFP
I was on regular H1B for three years until mid 2008 when I changed to H4 status. Now, if I want to work for a non-profit organization, does the org have to just transfer the original H1B or file a new non-profit petition. If it is the latter (new petition) what happens to my original H1 approval? If I want to go back to the for-profit world do I need to apply for a new H1 or will my original H1 validity continue??
Thanks
AFP
more...
grupak
11-15 01:29 PM
North Carolinians join us. Lets work together.
We had our first meeting, there are plans to meet local lawmakers. We need member participation.
We had our first meeting, there are plans to meet local lawmakers. We need member participation.
2010 Remember when Lauren was
pappu
04-05 02:37 PM
/\/.\/
more...
brick2006
11-28 07:28 PM
hello folks..
I was on H1.. but i quit my job and i am currently enrolled as a Full time student.
I need to go to Mexico as part of my Study program....
I have received the change of status from USCIS..but i need to get my passport stamped..
I have not been successful in getting an appointment in Canada....
>>is there a wait time in any canadian consulates...for more than 2-3 days????
>> Can i go to mexico and get the visa stamped during my stay there..is it risky???
inputs Pleaseeeee..
I was on H1.. but i quit my job and i am currently enrolled as a Full time student.
I need to go to Mexico as part of my Study program....
I have received the change of status from USCIS..but i need to get my passport stamped..
I have not been successful in getting an appointment in Canada....
>>is there a wait time in any canadian consulates...for more than 2-3 days????
>> Can i go to mexico and get the visa stamped during my stay there..is it risky???
inputs Pleaseeeee..
hair Proof: Lauren Conrad was less
gc28262
07-07 11:44 AM
Form AR-11 asks for the date my stay in the United States will expire. What date should I use? Currently, I am on working on EAD (I-485 pending) and last entered US on AP.
Note: Sorry for a duplicate thread. I posted my previous one in I-140 section. :confused:
IMO you should put the EAD expiry date. ( The fact is stay will never expire since it is a AOS pending).
Note: Sorry for a duplicate thread. I posted my previous one in I-140 section. :confused:
IMO you should put the EAD expiry date. ( The fact is stay will never expire since it is a AOS pending).
more...
dilbert_cal
03-09 05:51 PM
Answer Embedded
Need your help..
Post MBA (since Jun'06), I am working with a new employer. My previous employer (bachelor degree), filed for my labor in Nov'04 and I left this company in Jun'06; howevr employer didn't withdrew my labor application. My labor with previous employer was approved in Feb'07. I have good relation with my previous employer and they are ready to file my I-140; I have few questions regarding this:
Can my previous employer file I-140, even if I am not working with them?
YES
If I-140 is approved, would I able to transfer the PD to my new employer, when he initiates my labor application.
YES, you would need a copy of the I-140 and since you have good relations, it should not be an issue
Once I transfer my PD, can my previous employer use this approved LC for other candidate?
This is a grey area. Not sure but I believe post-April, approved LC would have a validity of 45 days or so - so it may not be reusable. From your point of view, I'm not sure if the LC does get reused, does it impact your PD or not - my take is it doesnt but I'm not a lawyer.
Based on my new qualifications (MBA), my job description has changed totally compared to my previous job.
Thanks in advance..
Need your help..
Post MBA (since Jun'06), I am working with a new employer. My previous employer (bachelor degree), filed for my labor in Nov'04 and I left this company in Jun'06; howevr employer didn't withdrew my labor application. My labor with previous employer was approved in Feb'07. I have good relation with my previous employer and they are ready to file my I-140; I have few questions regarding this:
Can my previous employer file I-140, even if I am not working with them?
YES
If I-140 is approved, would I able to transfer the PD to my new employer, when he initiates my labor application.
YES, you would need a copy of the I-140 and since you have good relations, it should not be an issue
Once I transfer my PD, can my previous employer use this approved LC for other candidate?
This is a grey area. Not sure but I believe post-April, approved LC would have a validity of 45 days or so - so it may not be reusable. From your point of view, I'm not sure if the LC does get reused, does it impact your PD or not - my take is it doesnt but I'm not a lawyer.
Based on my new qualifications (MBA), my job description has changed totally compared to my previous job.
Thanks in advance..
hot File:Lauren Conrad 2008 MTV
nkappiah
07-19 09:51 PM
I got married recently. Both my husband and I have similar priority dates as labour was filed separately for each of us by our respective companies. Is there any downside to adding each other to our applications and dual filing for greencard?
Is there any downside to having two applications in each name? Should we do this?
Thanks
N
Is there any downside to having two applications in each name? Should we do this?
Thanks
N
more...
house lauren conrad vma 2008
johnggberg
08-12 10:38 AM
dont worry about it, your good to go, i did it to back in 2002 i didnt had any problems. good luck
tattoo Lauren Conrad Holiday 2008
dbevis
June 12th, 2005, 04:26 AM
Nice choices. Those two lens will no doubt get a lot of use. They certainly seem to be working well for you in these shots.
more...
pictures 05/31/2008 - Lauren Conrad
f1USvisaholder
04-03 09:17 PM
Hi,
I'm on F1 visa and recently got married in US..I would like to have my lastname changed in my INDIAN passport.. I will apply for a new INDIAN passport through indian embassy in US..I realized that i will get a new passport with new last name...But my question is what happens to the F1 visa on the old passport and I-94, will they be still valid?...How does it work..what do i need to get them moved over to the new passport...
I know i will have to let my school know about the name change so that they can get me a new I-20 by updating the SEVIS...I've already done that and they are OK with it...
Appreciate your response..
Thanks
I'm on F1 visa and recently got married in US..I would like to have my lastname changed in my INDIAN passport.. I will apply for a new INDIAN passport through indian embassy in US..I realized that i will get a new passport with new last name...But my question is what happens to the F1 visa on the old passport and I-94, will they be still valid?...How does it work..what do i need to get them moved over to the new passport...
I know i will have to let my school know about the name change so that they can get me a new I-20 by updating the SEVIS...I've already done that and they are OK with it...
Appreciate your response..
Thanks
dresses lauren_conrad.jpg
go_guy123
07-28 08:24 PM
fyi
Congress may push India's IT firms to Mexico with H-1B crackdown (http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9135883/Congress_may_push_India_s_IT_firms_to_Mexico_with_ H_1B_crackdown)
That logic wont sell....sending mexican software engineers to US.
If mexican citziens are sent on TN2 ....well they can also change jobs as well if they are
"used" for 80 hours a week. Murthy is talking from his a**
Congress may push India's IT firms to Mexico with H-1B crackdown (http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9135883/Congress_may_push_India_s_IT_firms_to_Mexico_with_ H_1B_crackdown)
That logic wont sell....sending mexican software engineers to US.
If mexican citziens are sent on TN2 ....well they can also change jobs as well if they are
"used" for 80 hours a week. Murthy is talking from his a**
more...
makeup Lauren Conrad Lauren Conrad in
rohiral
04-28 08:47 AM
Hey there
I have been trying to access the donor forums post a paypal donation and I cant access them. Is there a wait period or an activation that needs to occur?
I have been trying to access the donor forums post a paypal donation and I cant access them. Is there a wait period or an activation that needs to occur?
girlfriend Lauren Conrad, Hilary Duff or
maddipati1
01-08 10:18 PM
/\
hairstyles Lauren Conrad
godblessamerica_2009
02-16 03:01 PM
any respnse pls
jaane_bhi_do_yaaro
08-06 09:00 PM
Join the donor, the fun is right in their.
Is the fun there or fun their (donors)?
:)
Is the fun there or fun their (donors)?
:)
Blog Feeds
12-18 09:50 AM
As a California immigration lawyer who files many asylum cases, I am used to thinking of a the United States as a place of refuge and to documenting the horrible country conditions of other countries. I have successfully represented applicants for asylum who feared staying in their countries because while serving in their countries' armies, they were harmed on account of their sexual orientation.
It is therefore rather surprising to come across a story of a U.S.soldier who is fleeing to Canada (http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/11/20/refugee-board-soldier-lesbian.html) because she fears harm in the U.S. Army on account of her sexual orientation. According to CBC news, U.S. Army Pte. Bethany Smith fled Canada in September 2007 from a U.S. Army base in Fort Campbell, Ky. She applied for refugee status in October 2007, saying that she was harassed and threatened by fellow soldiers over her sexual orientation and feared that her life would be in danger if she were deported and returned to the army. The Canadian authorities initially rejected in her claim in February 2009. However, on appeal, the Federal Court of Canada held that the refugee board must reconsider the case again because the Board made several mistakes in initially reviewing her claim.
The Federal Court's decision (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/Smith%20and%20the%20Minister%20of%20Citizenship%20 and%20Immigration.pdf)noted that the refugee board failed to fully consider the evidence pertaining to the situation of gays and lesbians in the U.S. Army to determine whether Pte. Smith could have availed herself of protection in the United States. The Federal Court also noted that the Board failed to determine whether Pte. Smith would be persecuted on account of her social group - as a lesbian in the U.S. Army if forced to return. There were other errors mentioned in the decision.
It is sad that the U.S. policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," is the basis of an asylum claim in Canada. Pt. Smith was only 19 years old when she fled to Canada. From everything I read, it appears that she wanted to serve in the U.S. Army and no real desire to leave the United States. At a time when we apparently need people to serve in the Armed Forces and in fact give non-citizens a way to immigrate to the United States faster for their service, it seems ridiculous that an American citizen should have to leave. It it is time to eliminate the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/11/us_army_soldier_applies_for_as.html)
It is therefore rather surprising to come across a story of a U.S.soldier who is fleeing to Canada (http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/11/20/refugee-board-soldier-lesbian.html) because she fears harm in the U.S. Army on account of her sexual orientation. According to CBC news, U.S. Army Pte. Bethany Smith fled Canada in September 2007 from a U.S. Army base in Fort Campbell, Ky. She applied for refugee status in October 2007, saying that she was harassed and threatened by fellow soldiers over her sexual orientation and feared that her life would be in danger if she were deported and returned to the army. The Canadian authorities initially rejected in her claim in February 2009. However, on appeal, the Federal Court of Canada held that the refugee board must reconsider the case again because the Board made several mistakes in initially reviewing her claim.
The Federal Court's decision (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/Smith%20and%20the%20Minister%20of%20Citizenship%20 and%20Immigration.pdf)noted that the refugee board failed to fully consider the evidence pertaining to the situation of gays and lesbians in the U.S. Army to determine whether Pte. Smith could have availed herself of protection in the United States. The Federal Court also noted that the Board failed to determine whether Pte. Smith would be persecuted on account of her social group - as a lesbian in the U.S. Army if forced to return. There were other errors mentioned in the decision.
It is sad that the U.S. policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," is the basis of an asylum claim in Canada. Pt. Smith was only 19 years old when she fled to Canada. From everything I read, it appears that she wanted to serve in the U.S. Army and no real desire to leave the United States. At a time when we apparently need people to serve in the Armed Forces and in fact give non-citizens a way to immigrate to the United States faster for their service, it seems ridiculous that an American citizen should have to leave. It it is time to eliminate the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/11/us_army_soldier_applies_for_as.html)
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário